Thread:Fire Eater/@comment-5774380-20180510141938/@comment-1327106-20180613043057

It's not necessarily how much you dislike him as how you say it and how often you say it. A calm and rational critique is fine, but you were getting angry and wound up in the days leading up to your last ban. Aside from posting in the wrong threads, you were taking every opportunity to vent.

The goal of the forums is to have a discussion. So once you've had a chance to say what you want, that's it. If someone responds, you can add new information, but if you start ranting and derail the rest of the thread's conversation by the frequency and anger of your posts, that's when you get a time out. The rest of the visitors reading the thread don't want to read a dozen posts of Isayama bashing when they're there to follow the story discussion of Chapter 105.

This applies across threads too. If no one is responding to you or a post is deleted in one thread, you don't move over to another one and repost the same thing.

This thing you wrote in the Chapter 106 thread: ''Somehow, I get the feeling this is a case of Tell, Don't Show. When did that ever get any high emphasis anywhere in the manga? The entire situation, the actual murder, rings hollow because of all the circumstances surrounding it.''

That's good criticism.

More comments like that and less of how Isayama is destroying the series (since by all accounts it's doing just fine, and we can back that up with sales data).