Thread:Manuel de la Fuente/@comment-24930713-20150826045245/@comment-5774380-20150826140923

LOL, why are you doing the tests on another wiki? :P

Looking at the code, it is even much more complex than I imagined, and the syntax is impossible to understand unless I search for the template and analyze it. Also, it occupies almost the same space than the regular infobox.

An alternative to simplify it would be to prescind from the parameters and use something like this:

First field: Name of the character Second field: Relationship (mother, sister, etc) Third field: Status Fourth field: Category

A way simpler alternative (in the aspect of the syntax, but not in the size of the subtemplate) would be to make a template like this and simply store the information there:



Then, in the code of the infobox, you'd just find this:

And change it for:

And the user don't need to use inputs at all because the template fills the information automatically depending of the page name.

Personally, I'm still fine with the current infobox. It's just simple, easy, descriptive, and I don't think the size is a "problem" that warrants the use of subtemplates. Is something that in programming we call the.