Category talk:Bad name

Useful?
I just created this category because I saw that Locket was recently working on renaming images with bad file names. Not sure if it's useful since there is already the Unsatisfactory image template that covers many more aspects, but I thought it could be convenient if someone wants to focus on the renaming of the images instead of other things like filling the Fair use rationale template.

What do you think? Should this category be kept or removed?--Manuel de la Fuente (talk) 05:03, June 25, 2015 (UTC)


 * I think it's useful, but like the other categories, they work best when people actually add them. If I'm remembering correctly, I've seen a couple that didn't have fairuse or was unsatisfactory in every way; yet they had no category to distinguish them as such. I was actually using my admin abilities to look through all the categories, quite a few need work. @_@ Some images aren't getting certain categories like they're supposed to. But I think it would certainly be helpful for images added after today. Unless someone decides to go through several of the images and add this category. So hopefully people add it so that it works like it's intended too. EternalLocket (talk) 20:19, June 25, 2015 (UTC)