Board Thread:Shingeki no Kyojin Wiki/@comment-424719-20150404012154/@comment-5774380-20150410160754

Sharp Blades wrote: After reviewing the situation, starting from the proposal to remove Hfc2x to Gourgeist's post until this very board, I have to side with PrelateZeratul. Hfc2x and NeoSuperior had way more violations than even the suspicions against Prelate could amount to. I like EmperorJarjakine am distrustful of not only Manuel's motives but also his way of working around the wiki. It's already seemed to lower in condition than what it looked like a while ago before I made an account. Until I can see some real evidence against Prelate, this is what I'm thinking at the moment.

I also don't like the talking down that Prelate has received by TourguideNixon, EternalLocket, and Manuel. Also, Manuel, I don't think it's appropriate to tell Jarjakine not to vote. He's been here longer than any of us and was around when this situation started, and you weren't.

However, I don't want this to influence any other person's vote. The links are provided by Manuel, and this is my honest opinion on it. I think my comment to EmperorJarjakine was very clear. I didn't tell him not to vote, I said that he shouldn't vote without knowing all the information. I don't like that attitude of "I know no details, and I don't care". If someone is going to vote, at least they should learn the information first. You did it, and I respect that.

I don't have much to add to this situation aside to what I said in this same thread an this one, I'd just like to summarize that from my point of view, there were enough reasons to justify the demotion of PrelateZeratul, especially for his ease to mix things and accuse people of false crimes. Such behavior is dangerous in an admin, and those are not "suspicions", are facts. Now I even have first-hand confirmation since he has done it again accusing me of threatening to block him, demoting Gourgeist to secure my position, and more lies he has just made up out of rage. How many other accusations he has made in the same way? Do you really want an admin that is capable of accusing you in that fashion?

This even without taking into account the manipulative processes he uses and how he blatantly wants to block people with them.

Imagine for a moment that some day PrelateZeratul opens a case against you using that method. No one notified you and you didn't even have time to defend yourself, but he has told his own version of the events, a poll is open and people is voting. There are already three users voting against you, PrelateZeratul and other two who no one knows that are his siblings, and you can't vote since you're the accused. Do you think that process is fair and impartial? And note that you haven't broken any rule, he's accusing you for personal issues that not even happened here.

If you ask me, I don't think that Hfc2x and NeoSuperior should've continued as admins, since they were practically absent. But I don't think PrelateZeratul should've continued either. Tell me what you've done in that situation.