Thread:Manuel de la Fuente/@comment-24930713-20150908015619/@comment-24930713-20150909022548


 * As long as that's not a higher number than we manage to do on our slow days, then it's fine with me.
 * We should probably be lenient on this rule. I don't watch/read a lot, if not all, of the wikis we're affiliated with. So it's possible their subject may or may not be going through a temporary hiatus.
 * I assumed that much, but within that wouldn't the focus of their wiki be a problem? I don't know; I'd just hate to have to decline someone's request because they fulfilled all our requirements, but their wiki wasn't what we expected.
 * I wasn't sure about the favicon thing, only because it's not something I usually look at or notice. But the few affiliate pages I visited have it, so maybe people pay a lot of attention to that sort of thing. @_@
 * As it stands, the only wiki that may be questionable is the last one I accepted. Though, I'd like to give them time to get settled. They are trying to tackle a pretty large topic, basically any and all fictional characters. They also seem to have guidelines for how their character and weapon pages are supposed to be set up.
 * Seems fine by me

I only looked at a couple, but pretty much all of them seem to already follow are guidelines; except for maybe the one I mentioned above. We already have a lot to do here without worrying about backing tracking previous requests, I guess I'd rather apply it to future requests. But maybe we should set a specific time where we would come back and review our affiliates to make sure they're still active? Also, I didn't think of this before, should I have been handing out our wordmark when we accepted them as affiliates? If so, I guess there's some messages I need to make.... :/