Board Thread:Shingeki no Kyojin Wiki/@comment-424719-20150404012154/@comment-5774380-20150411032338

1. If people severe communication with you is because you don't know when to stop. People don't have your time nor your disposition to be always discussing with you, but you seem to think that if you keep insisting they will agree, whether by true conviction or just by fatigue.

2. I already agreed with you about the random blocking of Gourgeist, but that was not what you accused him for (you didn't even remember that). The promotion of Neo happened later. All your accusations were for personal issues masked as "violations" and "abuses", because you felt offended by his comments and he didn't want to promote or even talk to you. But I realized first-hand why he refused to talk, and if I had known of your behavior earlier, I'd have rejected your adminship request from the beginning too.

3. I'm responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.

4. Come back to my first point. I'm willing to talk too, but not all the day. You need to be more patient and understand that sometimes people is tired, have work, or simply is not the time to have long discussions.

5. That was not just me reverting the demotion, that was me promoting as admin to someone that I didn't know and stepping down to leave them the charge. That's not something to be done without knowing the person. The rules say that the need to be approached with common sense, and that's not common sense. If I'd have reverted the demotion by Neo, I'd have to demote you again immediately after due to the set of faults that I found which prove that you're not suitable to be an admin.

6. I cite the policies again: "Policies need to be approached with common sense; adhere to the spirit rather than the letter of the rules, and be prepared to ignore the rules on the rare occasions when they conflict with the goal of improving the wiki."

So no, your square interpretation of the rules regardless of their effects is not right, and trying to use them to accuse people for actions that happen on other sites or twist them to support your claims is not right either.

7. Speculations, speculations again. Are not you who asked not accuse someone just for speculations when some users brought the issue of your siblings? I have my reasons to speculate too, but I never attempted to do something just with that. When I wondered of your blocking was for many other reasons, especially your false accusations and the repeated use of the polls against the instructions of the Wikia Staff. And I just dropped the idea shortly after and not even talked about it until you brought it here. That's the difference.

My comments about my position are nothing new, I said the same in the previous thread:

"When we wonder if these events were actually illegal, the quick answer is yes, they were; at least if we define illegal as something that is not made as the rules say. However, I must mention that we are in a situation where the rules are no longer entirely useful."

"I'm aware that I don't meet the requirements to be an admin, but when I came here, NeoSuperior had been offline for a week, the Wiki had become outdated and there were vandals plaguing the site with no one to stop them, so I presented my request anyway, because the circumstances probably warranted an exception. NeoSuperior believed the same and agreed."

This is a complicated matter where almost everything has been done beyond the rules, I needed time and space to analyze everything and make the best decision for the Wiki, and no, you were not patient, almost every day you were urging me to close this matter and if I told you that I needed more information or time or that I was waiting for answers from the Wikia Staff you kept insisting and insisting.

After all these discussions, my conclusion is simple: you're not suitable to be an admin, stepping down and leave you the charge would be a bad idea, and since the rules say that they should be approached with common sense, I don't have any reason to grant your requests.