Board Thread:Theories/@comment-44086949-20191210042805/@comment-25933225-20200509174014

No matter what sacrifices were made in Avengers, that still just looks like a cheap way to ensure many movies can still be done with the characters they revived.

I absolutely love time travel. But certainly not in stories that were never meant to work with such a feature. Time travel is a very risky tool for storytelling, a few are the authors that handled it well when they introduced it in their stories when it wasn't supposed to be there. Just look a the mess Harry Potter the Cursed Child was when they introduced a non-fixed timeline when HP3 clearly established that it was a fixed timeline.

From the SnK character's perspectives, they'd try to do so they'd obtain the best outcome of the time travel if they discovered such a possibility. Despite the difficulties they could still face, there'll still be a nullifying of the weight of the events, which will partially destroy what SnK is.

Also, Isayama already said that he doesn't want to disapoint the readers but to hurt them. Don't tell me that changing the events of the past won't disapoint a big majority of the readers. (Well, I suppose that such a disapointment would hurt them XD)