Board Thread:Theories/@comment-44086949-20191210042805/@comment-44086949-20200509164633

It's been months since I've even thought of this crack theory of the iceburst stone. I no longer believe anything about it, and don't think it's the "key"' to anything. I will happily concede that. I'm not arguing for it.

However, your argument here is full of logical error, Razzylada. You commit the "No good scottsman" fallacy by claiming that no good writer would use time travel in their ending, and because Isayama is a good writer, he would never ever use time travel. Do you think the Russo Brothers are crappy writers because they used time travel in Endgame? You're projecting your own subjective views on good writing onto Yams and stating them as objective fact, which is wrong because it's contradicted by real scenerios. You leave out the possibility that he can be both a good writer and use time travel in his works. Let's say hypothetically he does do it. You can't claim that he "never meant to" include it when he's gone on record saying he writes his stories backwards. Also, I think I've been clear that I don't 100% rely on one person's words, but instead stack them up against what's actually happening.

I'm not going to go in on how it's been hinted, as I've already argued about it with you here, and you're basically repeating the same points. You deleted all of your posts since then, so I won't be doing it again. Yes it's a theory, but it's supported by multiple consistent facts that you can't handwave so easily. We'll have to see until the end of the series to determine who was right, but for now you've more than lost this debate already.