Board Thread:Shingeki no Kyojin Wiki/@comment-5774380-20150322152908/@comment-424719-20150322202139

"Siblings" I don't know why you keep using that term in such a dismissive manner. Check the wiki history and see that Jinx and I edit at the exact same time and it would be legitimately impossible to create that account and run it the way it is, I just couldn't do it in addition to thiss account. So with that beign said, let me respond to your flawed arguments. I suspect, given our history, you will just ignore my points and keep these generalized assumptions.

Please show me example, proof where I cherry picked rules. I have followed all of them to the tee and I challenge you to show me one example where I did this. Provide proof Nixon, stop the generalized assumptions. Please show me examples where I wanted staff to micromange the wiki, all they ever did was stop Neo shutting down a vote and blocking me for doing it. I challenge you to show me any indication that I am power-hungry, and want to rule this wiki. I post these proposals becaus people keep breaking the rules, not because I want to rule the wiki. Follow our rules, and you won't hear any guff from me.

I wasn't charging for leadership I already had admin when I posted my proposals. I couldn't accept the changes you made to Hange because they are simply wrong. Hange is ambiogious in the manga, get over it. The Manga is the 'A' canon and deciding to take a stand on this issue is in violation of our canon policy. Just deciding that we should because of "A long-held belief of the AoT community" is in violation of rules, and wrong.

My siblings have very different editing habits from me. Do1ball has been more or less inactive for a while and Jinx won't stop posting. They have similar interests in agenda because they follow the rules we have established here, not bully others and claim we're forcing our political agenda on anyone.

 Now, let's again talk about you actually violating policy.

1. You violated two tenets of our user page policy by telling me to get off it and claiming ownership of it.

2. You caused repeated edit wars on Hange's page. Who was the one to call for a discussion and an end to the edit warring? Jinx and myself, not you. Doing this, you removed information and inserted false information like Hange's first appearance.

3. Constant and harsh abuse on the wiki, not off it. Harassment is defined as "a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or [group of] persons". You can find my detailed list of his personal attacks here. Along with my shortened version – “Called me a social justice person, told me to stop forcing my political agenda, called me a goon, called Jinx a goon, implied she was stupid and didn't know what subjective meant, slowly spelt out summary implying she is stupid, called us both bullies, said we have ruined every page on this wiki, insulted our writing, lied that we don't source information, made fun of Jinx for a spelling error, called our work carnage, called Jinxs edit cancer, insulted our admin by calling him lazy, said I would get suspended if I didn't back down” Furthermore, Manuel himself messaged you and warned you that your actions were in violation of our policies. Who used strong-arm tactics? You did, by bullying several users.

4. You violated our block policy by calling for me to blocked for a year. "In general, the first block should be of a reasonably short duration". We don't block people for a year, even less so when they have violated no rules here.

Of the 7 reasons a user can be blocked on our blocking policy, I contend that Nixon has violated the following ones.

- Recurring vandalism or spamming

-Recurring failure to keep civil, such as making personal attacks or not adhering to a basic standard of civility.

-Recurring harrasment, defined by Wikipedia as "a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or group of persons"

-Continual edit warring

-No clearly discernable intent to observe non-behavioural policies <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:18.0pt">Show me one, just one example of a rule I abused or violated. Up there are several you just did. Also, I’m so pleased to hear that you don’t like people who abuse the rules, I’m assuming based on this you are working on a message telling Manuel to step down?