Board Thread:Wiki/@comment-28807545-20160621071026/@comment-28807545-20160704123024

Of course you won't be responding, but

"“A man fell 121 feet (37 meters), landing in a supine position on a wooden roof after having jumped from a 14th floor. In this case the roof was broken in at one point to a depth of 8 inches (20 cm), but this point was not directly under the area of force. The average force was undoubtedly in excess of 200 g. The victim walked away from the spot where he landed. His right arm had struck a 12 by 2 inch (30 by 5 cm) beam and stopped abruptly; the torso had continued in movement, with a resultant tearing action in the shoulder area. There were other injuries. Death was attributed to severance of brachial arteries, hemorrhage and shock. The circumstances in this case are somewhat similar to those in case 2, just described, there being no evidence of loss of consciousness or head injury.”

He walked away from his "instant death". Your ignorance is astounding, as well as how you continue to make up medical facts on the fly, as long as they are convenient for fitting your unsubstantiated narrative.

Of course now, if you are to respond, you will attempt to backtrack the factually WRONG stuff you said, and say that it really doesn't matter what could happen in real life because after all this is fiction. But guess what, fiction just adds a layer of UN-certainty rather than certainty in the direction of death, so if something wouldn't necessarily cause instant death IN REAL LIFE is transported into a fictional story, then it REALLY shouldn't necessarily cause instant death in fiction, which is why there is something called an "UNKNOWN" status, which you refuse to use because you are a stubborn fool.